Guardian360 or Cyberbis: Finding Your Security Fit
Both platforms provide essential visibility into digital risks, but their methods and end goals differ. This honest breakdown helps you decide which platform aligns with your operational needs and compliance requirements.
| Feature / Strategy | Guardian360 | Cyberbis |
|---|---|---|
| Core Philosophy | Compliance & Risk Governance | Continuous Risk Monitoring |
| Compliance Mapping | 25+ Standards (ISO, NIS2, etc.) | Risk-centric Reporting |
| Intrusion Detection | Built-in Honeypots | Threat Intelligence Focus |
| Partner Ecosystem | 100% Partner-Only | Mixed (Direct & Partner) |
| Deployment | Agentless Network-Wide | API & Sensor Based |
| Target Audience | MSPs & Compliance-Heavy Orgs | Enterprise Risk Teams |
When Cyberbis is the Right Choice
Cyberbis is a strong contender for organizations that prioritize real-time risk scoring and threat intelligence feeds. If your team is primarily focused on monitoring the external attack surface and wants a deep dive into risk analytics without the immediate need for formal auditor-ready compliance documentation, Cyberbis is a great fit.
When Guardian360 is the Right Choice
Choose Guardian360 if your security strategy is driven by governance and compliance. We are built for partners who need to show exactly how technical vulnerabilities map to regulations like NIS2 or ISO 27001. Additionally, our integrated honeypots provide a unique "active defense" layer that many risk-only platforms lack.
Analytics vs. Action
While Cyberbis excels at risk analytics, Guardian360 focuses on auditable action. We bridge the gap between "what is the risk?" and "how do we satisfy the auditor?", making it the preferred choice for managed service providers handling sensitive client estates.