Guardian360 or Attic Security: Which is Right for You?
Both platforms offer powerful security, but they solve different problems. Use this honest comparison of features, scope, and methodology to find the best fit for your security strategy.
| Comparison Point | Guardian360 | Attic Security |
|---|---|---|
| Security Focus | Broad Infra, Web & Compliance | M365 & Entra ID Hardening |
| Deployment approach | Agentless / Network-wide | API-based M365 integration |
| Compliance coverage | 25 + frameworks (ISO, NIS2, etc) | CIS M365 Benchmark focus |
| Intrusion detection | Honeypot / Behavioural detection | Monitors configuration drift |
| Auto-remediation | Manual (Governance-led) | Optional automated correction |
| Remediation Style | Ideal for "Human-in-the-loop" | Ideal for "Set and forget" |
| Mobile app | Yes | No |
| Pricing / MSP model | Per employee/IP (Partner-only) | Per-tenant (Direct & Partner) |
When Attic is the Right Choice
If your primary goal is M365 hardening and you want a platform that can automatically fix configuration errors, Attic is an excellent specialist tool. It is built for organizations that need a "set and forget" approach to Microsoft cloud security.
When Guardian360 is the Right Choice
Choose Guardian360 if you need broad visibility across your entire infrastructure (not just Microsoft). We are the better fit for companies requiring formal compliance mapping (like NIS2 or ISO 27001) and active threat detection via honeypots.
A Difference in Methodology
Attic emphasizes automation. Guardian360 emphasizes governance and oversight. We believe the partner should remain in control of remediation steps to ensure that security changes don't disrupt critical business workflows.